SC orders Senate, House to comment on Sara Duterte impeachment voting threshold petition
On the deadline and framing of the petition
The Manila Times reported that the Senate and House were given five days to comment and described the petition as seeking to halt the impeachment proceedings, while Philstar cited an en banc resolution dated October 14 and other outlets did not mention a specific deadline or describe the petition as seeking to halt proceedings.
All outlets reported that the Supreme Court directed the Senate impeachment court and the House of Representatives to comment on a petition challenging the voting threshold rule in the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, filed by Senators Robinhood Padilla and Bong Go.
Drafted with AI from these 4 reports, checked and approved by a Parley editor. Approved 30 Oct, 9:19 AM.
What each outlet reported
Inquirer reported that the Supreme Court directed the Senate impeachment court and the House of Representatives to comment on a petition filed by Senators Robinhood Padilla and Bong Go questioning the voting rule.
Read Inquirer's report →Daily Tribune reported that the Supreme Court directed the Senate impeachment court and the House of Representatives to comment on a petition challenging the revised voting threshold.
Read Daily Tribune's report →GMA News Online reported that the Supreme Court ordered the Senate and House to comment on a petition filed by Senators Robin Padilla and Bong Go seeking to declare the ruling on the voting threshold null.
Read GMA News Online's report →Philstar reported that the Supreme Court ordered the Senate and House to answer the petition first, citing an en banc resolution dated October 14, before acting on the impeachment vote threshold plea.
Read Philstar's report →Excerpts courtesy of GMA Network and GMA News Online.
Discuss this story→